Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 19(11): 1393-1399, nov. 2017. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-167121

RESUMO

Purpose. As elective axillary dissection is loosing ground for early breast cancer (BC) patients both in terms of prognostic and therapeutic power, there is a growing interest in predicting patients with (nodal) high tumour burden (HTB), especially after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) because they would really benefit from further axillary intervention either by complete lymph-node dissection or axillary radiation therapy. Methods/patients. Based on an analysis of 1254 BC patients in whom complete axillary clearance was performed, we devised a logistic regression (LR) model to predict those with HTB, as defined by the presence of three or more involved nodes with macrometastasis. This was accomplished through prior selection of every variable associated with HTB at univariate analysis. Results. Only those variables shown as significant at the multivariate analysis were finally considered, namely tumour size, lymphovascular invasion and histological grade. A probability table was then built to calculate the chances of HTB from a cross-correlation of those three variables. As a suggestion, if we were to follow the rationale previously used in the micrometastasis trials, a threshold of about 10% risk of HTB could be considered under which no further axillary treatment is warranted. Conclusions. Our LR model with its probability table can be used to define a subgroup of early BC patients suitable for axillary conservative procedures, either sparing completion lymph-node dissection or even SNB altogether (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Axila/patologia , Modelos Logísticos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Carga Tumoral , Prognóstico , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Sobrevida , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 19(6): 704-710, jun. 2017. tab, ilus
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-162827

RESUMO

Purpose. Roughly two-thirds of early breast cancer cases are associated with negative axillary nodes and do not benefit from axillary surgery at all. Accordingly, there is an ongoing search for non-surgical staging procedures to avoid lymph-node dissection or sentinel node biopsy (SNB). Non-invasive imaging techniques with very high sensitivity (Se) and negative predictive value (NPV) could eventually replace SNB. We aimed to establish the role of axillary US and MRI, alone or in combination, associated with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) in the prediction of axillary node involvement. Methods/patients. Between January 2003 and September 2015, we included 1505 of the 1538 breast cancer patients attending our centres. All patients had been referred from a single geographical area. Axillary US, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (US-FNAB) were performed if required. Results. 1533 axillary US examinations and 1351 axillary MRI studies were analyzed. For axillary US, Se, Specificity (Sp), Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and NPV were 47.5, 93.6, 82.5, and 73.8%, respectively. For axillary MRI, corresponding values were 29.8, 96.6, 84.9, and 68.4%. When both tests were combined, Sp and PPV slightly improved over individual tests alone. US-FNAB showed a 100% Sp and PPV, with a Se of 80%. Conclusion. We may confidently state that axillary US and US-FNAB have to be included in the preoperative work-up of breast cancer patients (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama , Axila , Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Axila/patologia , Triagem/normas , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Período Pré-Operatório , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 18(11): 1098-1105, nov. 2016. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-156875

RESUMO

Introduction. Until recently, completion ALND has been considered the standard of care after a positive SN in breast cancer patients. However, most patients will not display further axillary involvement. The Tenon score is a simple nomogram that can be used intraoperatively to avoid completion ALND in low-risk patients. We aimed at validating the Tenon score on a SN-positive patient sample that had been preoperatively selected using axillary US examination. Patients and method. We used a retrospective analysis of our bicentric database that included 246 breast cancer patients with a positive SN. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values for each cut-off point. ROCs were constructed and corresponding AUC values were calculated as a measure of discriminative capacity. Results. At least one non-SN was positive in 52 patients (21.1 %). 118 patients (48 %) had a score up to 5. Among them, three had at least one positive non-SN. NPV was 97.5 %. Using that threshold, the ROCs analysis showed an AUC of 0.822 (95 % CI 0.764-0.880). Conclusion. Use of preoperative axillary US examination led to a modification of the proposed Tenon cut-off value from 3.5 to 5 to attain good predictive power for non-SN status. Straightforward intraoperative use of the Tenon score may be considered an advantage over other available nomograms (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Período Pré-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Nomogramas , Metástase Neoplásica/tratamento farmacológico
4.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 17(4): 296-305, abr. 2015. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-134249

RESUMO

Background and aim: Recent introduction of breast units, mass-screening programmes (SP) and sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has impacted on the clinical care of breast cancer patients (BC), resulting in a significant increase of breast-conserving surgery with the goal of achieving completely free margins and good cosmetic outcome, along with significantly less axillary morbidity. In order to ascertain the combined impact of SP and SNB on BC patients, we have reviewed the primary therapeutic approach of patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma in our centre, both before and after implementation of the two new procedures. Methods: 1,942 patients operated for BC between 1997 and 2013 in two clinical centres. Two historical periods were considered: before and after the advent of the Breast Unit in our institutions and the concurrent implementation of SP and SNB (September 2002). Results: Rates of breast-conserving surgery and re-operations improved in the second period. Intraoperative margin re-excision increased in the second period. Breast-conserving surgery decreased in parallel to stage: from 79 % for stage I to 31 % for stage III. The Cox analysis, including stage as adjusted for all significant variables, showed statistically significant differences in favour of the initial stages but only for specific mortality, not overall mortality. Conclusions: Combined implementation of breast units, SP, and SNB have resulted in a significant improvement of BC treatment leading to increased rates of breast-conserving surgery and decreased disease recurrence and mortality (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Metástase Neoplásica/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Seguimentos , Análise de Sobrevida
5.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 17(3): 238-246, mar. 2015. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-133312

RESUMO

Introduction. In 2011, the St Gallen panel introduced several changes in breast cancer classification, thereby creating the luminal B Her2− subtype. In 2013, the panel also included Ki67 overexpression and PR <20 % as risk factors, while excluding GH3 in the absence of increased Ki67. We compared the classification of 2011 modified with the new 2013 St Gallen classification. Patients and method. Consecutive breast cancer patients referred to the Breast Unit of the University Hospital Mútua Terrassa and Hospital of Terrassa for surgical treatment of either primary or recurrent tumors were prospectively included between 1997 and 2014. Eventually, 1,874 cases were included for the four-subtype analysis. The median follow-up was of 66 months. Results. Using the 2013 St Gallen classification no significant differences were found in specific mortality rates between luminal A and B subtypes. There were significant differences at 5, 10, and, 15 years if we excluded luminal A GH3 patients in the absence of increased Ki67 (p = 0.004, 0.005, and 0.007). Luminal A sub-type patients showed significantly less distant metastases than the rest, including luminal B Her2− patients (p < 0.001). Also, luminal B patients showed significantly less distant metastases than pure Her2 (0.05) and triple negative (TN) (p < 0.001). There were no differences between pure Her2 and TN patients (0.055), neither among the different luminal B sub-types. Conclusion. GH3, PR, and Ki67 may all be discriminatory factors for metastasis and specific mortality. Therefore, we suggest including GH3 in the luminal B subtype in the absence of Ki67 (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Imuno-Histoquímica , Sobreviventes/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...